When it comes to women there have been a few important happenings in the  recent past. For the Indian women there were the 73rd and 74th  Amendments (1993) to the Constitution, providing for the reservation of  seats in the local bodies of panchayats and municipalities and, of  course, the post 1995 measures by the government that formed the icing.  It is a different issue that the cake was missing.
                  The government of India had floated zealously its grand ideas for  the country by declaring the year 2001 as Women's Empowerment Year, with  a focus on achieving the "vision in the new century of a nation where  women are equal partners with men". What followed was a spate of  programmes and schemes with fine names: 
Swashakti and 
Stree Shakti for women's empowerment; 
Swayam Siddha to benefit nearly a lakh women through micro-credit programmes, 
Balika Samrudhi Yojana for the girl child and a horde of various other projects, doubtlessly with intentions of going about a greater common good.         
         Since independence, India has developed several initiatives for  guaranteeing education to its people. Although some progress has been  achieved, the ever growing population has always come in the way. What  is worrisome is the inconsistency that marks the efforts. Every once in a  while, when a programme is to be launched or a report released, the  activism comes to the fore. For rest of the time the problem exists but  is too commonplace and ubiquitous to rouse strong motivation for  efforts.         
         In contrast to the tragedies of the communities affected by drought,  flood or civil conflict, the poverty, powerlessness and ill-health,  which accompany illiteracy are not easily captured on the camera and  brought to the attention of the international public opinion. Today, 125  million primary school age children are not in school; most of them are  girls.         
         The current literacy rate for women in India stands at 54.16 per cent, 
vis-a-vis  that of 75 per cent for males. Efforts are, however, on for raising the  standard of the girl child. There are several programmes being  undertaken.         
         It is true that after years of inflicting damage results cannot be  achieved in a day. Nonetheless, consistency in efforts will be better  than complacency. It will take some time, but the end result will be  rewarding. After all, it is not for nothing that it is said that when  you educate a boy you educate an individual, but when you educate a girl  you educate an entire family.                  
Economic Status         Women are the major contributors in terms of economic output, but  their contribution still remains to be made visible. Men and women are  not equally distributed across the types of work. Women are concentrated  in the primary sector and in unskilled and marginal work. 95 per cent  of women, as against 89 per cent men, are engaged in un-organised  sector, and most of them are found in the rural areas. According to the  2001 census, 90 million women constitute the workforce.         
         Industries that employ more women than men include, processing of  edible nuts, domestic services, bidi manufacturing, spinning, weaving,  finishing of coir textiles etc. Women also constitute majority of the  workforce employed as nurses, ayahs, paramedics and technical workers.  Their contribution goes unnoticed as most of the times they are involved  as unpaid or home-based workers, who often get counted as non-working  housewives.         
         In her paper on land laws and gender equity, Prof Bina Aggarwal  points out the fact that women are much more dependent on land-based  livelihoods. Over the years, while the male workers have been moving to  non-agricultural arenas, women have remained where they were, owing to  their lower mobility, less education and few assets. She notes, "firstly  there is systematic bias against the women and female children's  sharing of benefits from the male controlled resources—women without  independent resources are highly vulnerable to poverty and destitution  in case of divorce or widowhood. They often need titles to avail credit  facilities."         
         In last one decade the Union and State governments have envisaged  the eradication of poverty through women-oriented programmes, as a major  chunk of the population below the poverty line remains the hapless  women. The women can also be benefited in a large measure through  generating adequate amount of legal awareness and helping them in making  efforts to farm collectively, as is being done by the Deccan  Development Society (DDS) in Andhra Pradesh.                  
Marriage and reproductive health         Although the practice of child marriage is history for most, it  still continues to be a reality of life in the rural India, especially  in the North and West pockets of the country. Every once in a while,  there are shocking incidents (which make it to the covers of popular  magazines and hit the front pages of newspapers because of the element  of horrific unusualness). The news stirs up people, only to fade away in  a couple of days when the oddity has turned boring.         
         Child marriages, banned by law, continue to take place and yet there  is no action against this practice. No amount of legislation will be  effective as long as the political will to promote gender equity is  absent.         
         The Dowry Prohibition Act has been in force for five decades, and  yet, countless atrocities are perpetrated as a result of this despicable  practice that finds favour with scores of the households. Marrying off a  boy not only marks an easy road to prosperity, but also is seen as  redemption of money spent on the daughter's wedding.         
         Girls in early teens are "traded off" in the name of marriage to men  who are older by nothing less than twenty to twenty five years, for a  certain amount of money. This saves them the hassle of dowry as well as  the search for a groom! The common practice in rural India is to marry  the girls around the age of fourteen or fifteen, triggering off an early  motherhood for most. Quite the reason for the reproductive health  scenario not being so encouraging.         
         Another complexity that leaves the women at cross roads is fear of  the apparent persecution if she bears a daughter. The startling fact is  that, on the whole, women themselves prefer a male child despite the  negative impact of this mindset on their lives. This seems to be a  culturally conditioned choice. This is also the reason why technologies  like ultrasound and amniocentesis are being used to determine sex of the  child in the womb.         
         The apathy towards the gender inequities is evident in the classes that are expected to deliver better.                  
         After all these years, it is sad to see the blatant use of woman as a  mere "tool" that can be used at will to achieve various ends, and to  see it as a much exploited subject for speeches, seminars, schemes and  slogans. The crux is that till socio-cultural attitudes are addressed,  there can be little meaningful done for achieving gender parity. Women  in India are not lacking in self-confidence, but it is important for  them to be realising this individually, as well as collectively.  Individual self-confidence can be bolstered by the parental confidence,  and through approval and appreciation of the community they are a part  of.                  
Domestic violence         The phenomenon of domestic violence is widely prevalent, but has  remained largely unseen. Millions of Indian women have, by and large,  grown to accept spousal violence and, worse still, being subjected to  humiliation and indignity which cripple them mentally. Afraid of the  law, men may not commit acts of violence, but, in turn, resort to  psychologically pressurising the woman, which has results still worse in  nature.         
         According to the Crime Records Bureau of the Union Home Ministry, of  all cases of crime committed against women every year, almost 37 per  cent are cases of domestic violence. Then, there are women—especially  those belonging to the middle and upper middle classes—who keep quiet  for the sake of the family's image.         
         Most social workers and counsellors agree that the number of  domestic violence cases has increased, but attribute the increased  reporting to the growing realisation among women that they have to fight  back. Domestic violence among the lower class is accepted, and among  the upper class it is swept under the carpet. What we get to see is only  the emerging middle class, because here the value systems have changed  tremendously, whereas the societal systems have not. Sociologist Mohua  Bandyopadhyaya also corroborates the facts: "with more and more women in  the work place, the modern male feels under siege, and the frustration  is taken out on the woman on whom he feels he can assert his will."         
         There's more to domestic violence than physical abuse. Emotional trauma can be far more crippling.                  
Legislative Status         Women in India have made major inroads in various male-dominated  professions, including the governmental bureaucracy. In the fields of  business, medicine, engineering, law, art and culture, women who were  given opportunities to acquire the necessary skills and education have  proven themselves capable of holding their own, without availing of any  special measures to facilitate their entry. But they have failed to gain  ground in the field of politics. Moreover, the agenda of women's  empowerment seems to have lost the kind of moral and political  legitimacy it enjoyed during the freedom movement, as was evident from  the ugly scenes in the aftermath of tabling of the Women's Reservation  Bill in the Parliament.         
         Infact, women are moving in the direction of near equal political  participation in only a handful of countries, such as Germany, Sweden,  Norway, Denmark and Finland. In these societies, women have begun to  seriously alter the very nature of politics, making enduring, and  substantial gains in every field.         
         All trends indicate that women's representation in politics requires  special consideration, and cannot be left to the forces that presently  dominate our parties and government. Today, even the best of female  parliamentarians feel sidelined and powerless within their respective  parties. Most women in electoral and party politics are an ineffective  minority within their own respective political groupings.
         The very same male party leaders who compete with each other in  announcing their support of special reservations for women, have shown  little willingness to include women in party decision-making, or even to  help create a conducive atmosphere for women's participation in their  own organisations.         
         In fact, women's marginalisation is even more pronounced in the  day-to-day functioning of almost all political parties, than in the  Parliament. Therefore, it is urgently required that we take special  measures to enhance women's political participation. Our democracy will  remain seriously flawed if it fails to yield adequate space to women.
                  SEXUAL HARASSMENT         The Supreme Court judgement on Sexual Harassment of working women in the case of 
Vishakha vs. the State of Rajasthan (August  1997) initiated debate on the issue not just among women’s groups,  lawyers and activists, but also among women in the workplace. For the  first time, behaviour that can be considered sexual harassment has been  explicitly legally defined.         
         “… sexual harassment includes such unwelcome sexually determined behaviour (whether directly or by implication) as:
         —Physical contact and advances; a demand or request for sexual favours;
         —sexually coloured remarks;
         —showing pornography;
         —any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature.”         
         The guidelines are significant in that, for the first time sexual  harassment is identified as a separate category of legally prohibitive  behaviour. Sexual harassment should be considered a separate legal  offence not because it is less serious (as some have argued), but  because it is taken less seriously.         
         Particularly in the absence of witnesses or other concrete proof, it  often becomes the complainant’s word against the harasser’s. Further,  in addition to sexual harassment being a violation of the right to safe  working conditions, the guidelines also proclaim it to be a violation of  women’s right to equal opportunity in the workplace.         
         It is the duty of the employer or other responsible persons in work  places or other institutions to prevent sexual harassment and to provide  procedures for resolution of complaints. Women who either draw a  regular salary, receive an honorarium, or work in a voluntary  capacity—in the government; private sector or un-organized sectors—come  under the purview of these guidelines.                  
Main guidelines are:                   - Express prohibition of sexual harassment should be notified and circulated. 
- Prohibition of sexual harassment should be included in the rules and regulations of government and public sector bodies. 
- Private employers should include prohibition of sexual  harassment in the standing orders under the Industrial Employment  (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. 
- Appropriate work conditions should be provided for work,  leisure, health, and hygiene to further ensure that there is no hostile  environment towards women at workplaces and no woman employee should  have reasonable grounds to believe that she is disadvantaged in  connection with her employment.
- Sexual harassment should be affirmatively discussed at worker’s  meetings, employer-employees meetings and other appropriate forums. 
- Guidelines should be prominently notified to create awareness of the rights of female employers. 
- The employer should assist persons affected in cases of sexual harassment by outsiders or third parties. 
- Central and State governments are required to adopt measures  including legislation to ensure that private employers also observe  guidelines. 
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005         The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 was brought  into force from October 26, 2006. The Act was passed by the Parliament  in August 2005 and assented to by the President in September 2005.         
         For the purposes of this Act, any conduct of the respondent shall  constitute domestic violence if he (a) habitually assaults or makes the  life of the aggrieved person miserable by cruelty of conduct even if  such conduct does not amount to physical ill-treatment; or (b) forces  the aggrieved person to lead an immoral life; or (c) otherwise injures  or harms the aggrieved person.         
         Nothing contained in clause (c) of sub-section (1) shall amount to  domestic violence if the pursuit of course of conduct by the respondent  was reasonable for his own protection or for the protection of his or  another’s property.         
         Primarily meant to provide protection to the wife or female live-in  partner from domestic violence at the hands of the husband or male  live-in partner or his relatives, the law also extends its protection to  women who are sisters, widows or mothers. Domestic violence under the  act includes actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical,  sexual, verbal, emotional or economic. Harassment by way of unlawful  dowry demands to the woman or her relatives would also be covered under  this definition.